www.injusticeinontario.ca
Injustice
in
Home FAQ
Privacy policy contact us
My
name is Robert Burgiss, from 1998 today I have uncovered Evidence
of
police corruption in
Because
the courts are swamped some police officers are doing sloppy investigations
so that there is not enough evidence to file
charges. And or telling the victim that
there is not enough Evidence to file Chargers
against anyone.When there really
is
enough evidence. This is saving money.
I have
filed written complaints against the police officers who are doing
These
things. But the professional standers branch of the
Police service and the
Clearly covered up my complaints.
I
have also written to the news media about what is going on. Because I believe
that
if I can get the evidence out there for people
to see there will be a public out cry
about
what is going on and then some thing will be done about it. But for some
reason
the news media will not do a story on it.
So
I came up with the idea of putting the evidence on the Internet. Because I need
the
money I have decided to sell it in the form of an ebook. So I created my own
publishing
company injustice in
about
what happen it will be the actual complaint letters that I filed and the
letters
to
the government officials and the written response that I received. The letters
are
very
self-explanatory if you read them all.
I
am worried that when it comes out about what is going on. The letters that I
sent
out
and the copies of the letters that where sent to me may go missing from the police
station and the government offices. I am also
worried that the police will come to the
place
were I live and take the letters that are the evidence in my book and then say
that
they
did not say the things that they said in their letters. Because I would not
have the
letters to prove that they did said these
things. But hopefully by saying this it will not happen.
When
you read my book you will see that I have blacked out parts of the letters
that
I received. This is because section 29.1 of the copyright act says that you
can
use someone else’s copyrighted material for criticism purposes but you cannot
use
the entire work. So I have blacked out the parts of the letters that I received
that
are
not important and left in the parts that are important to getting my point
across.
When
you read my book you will see that some of the letters that I sent out do not
have responses with them. This is because I
did not receive a response to all of my
letters. Because some of the people that I
sent letters to have ignored my letters.
They
must have ignored my letters because I sent them by registered letter, or
xpresspost
and some times by fax.
In
my book there are complaints against the old Chief of police in Hamilton Ken
Robertson
and
the new Chief of police in Hamilton Brian J. Mullen. When you read my book you
will
see
how the too Chiefs of police have contradicted each
other.
My
book also has two chapters of letters about complaints that I filed against two
lawyers
that
worked for me. It shows that some members of the law society of
lied
to me and or are doing sloppy investigations.
There
is enough evidence in my book that it should lead to some criminal charges
being
laid
against police officers.
In
one complaint. I complained about police not
investigating a justice of the peace for
obstructing justice. The
professional Standards branch of the
said your interpretation of the law in these circumstances is
flawed. I then asked them
how my interpretation of the law is flawed. They said we do not give
out legal advice.
Appeal to OCCPS was denied. The
only reasonThat I can think of for them not to tell
me
is they have some thing to hide.
In
another complaint I filed a complaint against the chief
of police. Because after I called
the office of the Chief of
police and told him about my other complaints he did nothing
about what was going on. The
OCCPS said that the complaints were frivolous and vexatious
and were more then six mouths
old. But I was not complaining about the other officers
I was complaining about what the Chief of police did which was not
more then six mouths old.
In
another complaint. I complained about being falsely arrested for Trespassing. The
professional standards branch of the
trespassing but it was not a false
arrest because you were not charge with trespassing.
Appeal to OCCPS was denied.
In
another complaint. I asked the law society of
complaint against my lawyer by a non lawyer governor of the law
society. But they
refused to have my complaint review. When I asked them where it says
they can do
that. They would not tell me.
My ebook also shows that the Chief of Police in Hamilton Brian J.
Mullen and the chair
of the police services board in Hamilton Bernie Morelli have known
about what is going
on for years.
It is obstruction of justice to cover up a complaint
against a police officer.
It is also obstruction of justice for a police officer to do an
intentional sloppy
investigation to insure there is not enough evidence to file
charges.
There must be a public
inquiry into the Hamilton Police service
and the
In June of 2009 I called CHCH television in
that I have. But they still will not do it. I believe if enough
people see my evidence there
will be a public out cry. So if you know someone in the news media
that will do a story
on it or a way to get the story on the news please contact me. rburgiss@injusticeinontario.ca
On October 19, 2009 The office of the Independent police Review
Director open.
I have filed two complaints against police with the OIPRD but both
of my complaints
were covered up by the OIPRD My first complaint was filed on Dec
12, 2009 about something that happen on Dec 12, 2009. The OIPRD said “We cannot
proceed with your complaint as the incidents in 2005 you have referred to
predate October 19, 2009, the date on which the legislation that established
the OIPRD was proclaimed in force.
I have looked at the police services act and it clearly says that
complaints cannot be thrown out for that reason.
Here is what the police services act says
Power of Independent Police Review Director to refuse
60. (1) The Independent Police Review Director may, in accordance with this section, decide
not to deal with a complaint made to him or her by a member of the public under this Part. 2007,
c. 5, s. 10.
Limitation, six months
(2) The Independent Police Review Director may decide not to deal with a complaint made by a
member of the public if the complaint is made more than six months after the facts on which it is
based occurred. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.
Same
(3) In making a determination under subsection (2), the Independent Police Review Director
shall consider,
(a) whether the complainant is a minor or is under a disability within the meaning of the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005;
(b) whether the complainant is or was subject to criminal proceedings in respect of the events
underlying the complaint; and
(c) whether, having regard to all the circumstances, it is in the public interest for the complaint to
be dealt with. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.
Frivolous, vexatious, etc.
(4) The Independent Police Review Director may decide not to deal with a complaint made by a
member of the public if, in his or her opinion, one of the following applies:
1. The complaint is frivolous or vexatious or made in bad faith.
2. The complaint could be more appropriately dealt with, in whole or in part, under another Act
or other law.
3. Having regard to all the circumstances, dealing with the complaint is not in the public interest.
2007, c. 5, s. 10.
I then filed internal complaints with the OIPRD
The Director looked at the complaints and said they did nothing
wrong.
So I filed a complaint against the Director of the OIPRD with the
Attorney
General’s office. The Attorney General’s office said that
allegations against
the OIPRD must be quite serious in order to warrant investigation
and remedy.
I then filed a complaint against the Attorney General’s Office with
the
Ombudsman of
Against police is not serious to warrant an investigation then what
is.
But the Ombudsman’s Office would not do an investigation. I have
also
call Ontario NDP but they will not help me.
The reason for the name injustice in
is going on in other places in
My
hope is that by putting this evidence out there for people to see it will cause
some
thing to be done about what is going on.
I
might put in a chapter 20 with updated letters in it if and when I receive
them.
Injustice in Ontario table of contents
Thank you for buying my ebook!!!!!!
Because my book is letters that I have scanned into my computer it
is Very big in size
about 133 mb before it is made
into an ebook. Because the ebook delivery system I
use does not like big files. I had to make the book into 13 small
ebooks.
After you make a purchase you will be emailed a receipt. A download
Page will appear
after you complete your order
for you to download your ebooks. You will also get a
username and password for each ebook you purchase.
After you download the ebook and register it make sure to back it up
on CD.
Copyright © Robert Burgiss
2009 websitehosted by www.easycgi.com