www.injusticeinontario.ca
Injustice
in
If you have a
story of injustice please go to fixourworld.ca blog
and post it.
Sign petition to stop the
OIPRD from covering up complaints against police
If you are interested in
joining a protest against the OIPRD please email me. rburgiss@injusticeinontario.ca
My
name is Robert Burgiss, from 1998 today I have uncovered Evidence
of
police corruption in
Because
the courts are swamped some police officers are doing sloppy investigations
so that there is not enough evidence to file
charges. And or telling the victim that
there is not enough Evidence to file Chargers
against anyone. When there really
is
enough evidence. This is saving money.
I have
filed written complaints against the police officers who are doing
These
things. But the professional standers branch of the
Police
service and the
Clearly covered up my complaints.
I
have also written to the news media about what is going on. Because I believe
that
if I can get the evidence out there for people
to see there will be a public out cry
about
what is going on and then some thing will be done about it. But for some
reason
the news media will not do a story on it.
In
one complaint. I complained about police not
investigating a justice of the peace for
obstructing justice. The
professional Standards branch of the
said your interpretation of the law in these circumstances is
flawed. I then asked them
how my interpretation of the law is flawed. They said we do not give
out legal advice.
Appeal to OCCPS was denied. The
only reason That I can think of for them not to tell
me
is they have some thing to hide.
In
another complaint I filed a complaint against the chief
of police. Because after I called
the office of the Chief of
police and told him about my other complaints he did nothing
about what was going on. The
OCCPS said that the complaints were frivolous and vexatious
and were more then six mouths
old. But I was not complaining about the other officers
I was complaining about what the Chief of police did which was not
more then six mouths old.
In
another complaint. I complained about being falsely arrested for Trespassing. The
professional standards branch of the
trespassing but it was not a
false arrest because you were not charge with trespassing.
Appeal to OCCPS was denied.
In
another complaint. I asked the law society of
complaint against my lawyer by a non lawyer governor of the law
society. But they
refused to have my complaint review. When I asked them where it says
they can do
that. They would not tell me.
I also have evidence that shows that the Chief of Police in Hamilton
Brian J. Mullen and the chair of the police services board in Hamilton Bernie
Morelli have known about what is going on for years.
It is obstruction of justice to cover up a complaint
against a police officer.
It is also obstruction of justice for a police officer to do an
intentional sloppy
investigation to insure there is not enough evidence to file
charges.
There must be a public
inquiry into the Hamilton Police service
and the
In June of 2009 I called CHCH television in
that I have. But they still will not do it. I believe if enough
people see my evidence there
will be a public out cry. So if you know someone in the news media
that will do a story
on it or a way to get the story on the news please contact me. rburgiss@injusticeinontario.ca
On October 19, 2009 The office of the Independent police Review
Director open.
I have filed two complaints against police with the OIPRD but both
of my complaints
were covered up by the OIPRD My first complaint was filed on Dec
12, 2009 about something that happen on Dec 12, 2009. The OIPRD said “We cannot
proceed with your complaint as the incidents in 2005 you have referred to
predate October 19, 2009, the date on which the legislation that established
the OIPRD was proclaimed in force.
I have looked at the police services act and it clearly says that
complaints cannot be thrown out for that reason.
Here is what the police services act says
Power of Independent Police Review Director to refuse
60. (1) The Independent Police Review Director may, in accordance with this section, decide
not to deal with a complaint made to him or her by a member of the public under this Part. 2007,
c. 5, s. 10.
Limitation, six months
(2) The Independent Police Review Director may decide not to deal with a complaint made by a
member of the public if the complaint is made more than six months after the facts on which it is
based occurred. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.
Same
(3) In making a determination under subsection (2), the Independent Police Review Director
shall consider,
(a) whether the complainant is a minor or is under a disability within the meaning of the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005;
(b) whether the complainant is or was subject to criminal proceedings in respect of the events
underlying the complaint; and
(c) whether, having regard to all the circumstances, it is in the public interest for the complaint to
be dealt with. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.
Frivolous, vexatious, etc.
(4) The Independent Police Review Director may decide not to deal with a complaint made by a
member of the public if, in his or her opinion, one of the following applies:
1. The complaint is frivolous or vexatious or made in bad faith.
2. The complaint could be more appropriately dealt with, in whole or in part, under another Act
or other law.
3. Having regard to all the circumstances, dealing with the complaint is not in the public interest.
2007, c. 5, s. 10.
I then filed internal complaints with the OIPRD
The Director looked at the complaints and said they did nothing
wrong.
So I filed a complaint against the Director of the OIPRD with the
Attorney
General’s office. The Attorney General’s office said that
allegations against
the OIPRD must be quite serious in order to warrant investigation
and remedy.
I then filed a complaint against the Attorney General’s Office with
the
Ombudsman of
Against police is not serious to warrant an investigation then what
is.
But the Ombudsman’s Office would not do an investigation.
Even my MPP Ted McMeekin will not help.
In my
second complaint with the OIPRD I complained about police dropping an
investigation for no reason. The OIPRD said The OIPRD is aware of your concerns
however the
Director has decided not to proceed with your complaint as it was
determined to be not in
the public interest to do so and the alleged conduct, i.e.
dropping
the investigation of your criminal libel file, does not constitute a breach
either
of the police Code of Conduct or
the police services act.
I then
wrote to the OIPRD and asked them to tell me what the evidence was for them
throwing
out my complaint. But they are refusing to tell me.
The reason for the name injustice in
is going on in other places in
My
hope is that by putting this evidence out there for people to see it will cause
some
thing to be done about what is going on.
In May of 2011 I called CHCH news and talk to the assignment
director. She said she was interested in my story about the OIPRD throwing out
my complaint. So I copy the complaint and sent it to her. I called her a month
later she said she had sent the copy of the complaint to their lawyers to do
the research into the laws. Now they are saying that the story is just to big
for them to do.
I have also call the assignment director for CTV she said to send
her a copy of the complaint. Will call her back soon. She said that they just
do not do these kind of stories
So the best way to get the news media to do a story on something you
have. Is to first call them and ask for the assignment director or assignment
editor.
I have written to the RCMP because covering up a complaint against
the police is obstruction of justice. They said without a request from the
provincial government the RCMP cannot do an investigation. I then asked them
where it says they need a request from the provincial government but they would
not tell me. So I am thinking of suing the RCMP.
On January 03, 2012 I filed a law suit against
the RCMP.
Copyright © Robert Burgiss
2009 websitehosted by www.easycgi.com